• 7:00 pm » sports- #Dhoni to captain All-Star IPL XI picked by AB De Villiers
  • 7:00 pm » sports- #Kumar Sangakkara summoned in 2011 WC final fixing probe
  • 7:00 pm » sports- #Once the pride of Team India, this talented cricketer now sells snacks to make…
  • 7:00 pm » sports- #Video: England internal match shows future of cricket celebrations
  • 7:00 pm » sports- #When Dhoni landed at the CSK camp, he didn’t look rusty: Chawla

New Delhi: Singer Kanika Kapoor, who was the primary Bollywood superstar to have examined optimistic for COVID-19 in India, has damaged silence on her journey historical past, prognosis and therapy.

Kanika was admitted on March 20 when her exams revealed that she was Coronavirus optimistic.

She was discharged from the Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS) in Lucknow earlier this month.

She has now issued a press release on Twitter through which she has revealed why she selected to be silent all this whereas.

“Every person that I have come in contact with, be it in UK, Mumbai or Lucknow, has shown no symptoms of Covid-19. In fact all those tested have been negative,” she said in her assertion.

“I travelled from UK to Mumbai on March 10 and was duly screened at the international airport. I travelled to Lucknow the following day on March 11 to see my family. There was no screening set up for domestic flights. On March 14 and 15, I attended a friend’s lunch and dinner. There was no party hosted by me and I was in absolute normal health. I had symptoms on March 17 and 18, so I requested to be tested.”

The singer additionally talked about that she has been at dwelling for 21 days now and likewise thanked docs and medical workers for “taking care of her during a very emotionally testing time”.

She concluded the assertion by saying: “Negativity thrown at a person does not change the reality.”

A case had been registered in opposition to the singer, final month, for hiding her journey historical past and attending events after returning from London.

She was charged beneath IPC Section 269 (a negligent act more likely to unfold an infection of illness harmful to life) and Section 270 (malignant act more likely to unfold an infection of illness harmful to life).